Lalicat Browser Limitations No One Told Me About — What You Should Know

At first glance, Lalicat Browser looks like a compelling antidetect browser — affordable pricing, easy setup, and promising fingerprint protection. I was excited to test it out for scaling my ad accounts and managing multiple profiles. But after several weeks of use, I ran into major limitations no one talks about publicly. In this article, I’ll share exactly what I found — and the browser I now use instead.

Why I Tried Lalicat Browser

I manage a variety of ad campaigns — Facebook, TikTok, Google — and was looking for a budget-friendly antidetect browser for team use. Lalicat caught my eye because:

• It offered both Windows and Mac versions
• Pricing was much lower than other options
• Automation support was advertised
• It appeared easy to deploy for team members with less technical experience

I purchased a license and set up Lalicat across 50 ad profiles to test it in production.

Key Limitations I Encountered with Lalicat Browser

1️⃣ Outdated Fingerprint Profiles

While Lalicat supports many fingerprint options, I found that their fingerprint database wasn’t updated frequently enough. My tests revealed that certain Canvas and WebGL fingerprints were easily detectable on modern platforms.

2️⃣ Limited Automation API

Lalicat advertises automation support, but in practice, their API was limited and lacked proper documentation. Many of my scripts couldn’t run reliably or required constant patching after browser updates.

3️⃣ Poor Profile Syncing

When working with multiple team members, profile syncing across different machines was buggy and unreliable. We experienced lost cookies and corrupted profiles, which led to unnecessary account verifications and bans.

4️⃣ Instability Under Load

Running 50+ profiles simultaneously caused performance issues — slow UI, freezes, and even full application crashes. Stability dropped rapidly as we tried to scale up our operations.

5️⃣ Limited Proxy Rotation Features

Advanced proxy rotation (critical for farming and scaling ad accounts) wasn’t supported natively. I had to resort to third-party workarounds — adding complexity and risk.

The Browser I Now Use — Multilogin

After running into these issues, I realized Lalicat simply wasn’t ready for serious ad scaling. After consulting with other media buyers, I switched to Multilogin — and the difference was night and day.

Why Multilogin works better:

• Constantly updated fingerprint profiles — pass all modern detection tests
• Robust API support — fully compatible with my automation stack
• Reliable profile syncing — perfect for teams across multiple machines
• Excellent stability — easily runs 200+ profiles without crashing
• Built-in advanced proxy management — supports complex farming setups

Plus, with a Free Trial and a 50% discount (use code: ADBNEW50), migrating to Multilogin was fast and affordable.

Resources That Helped Me

• Multilogin Free Usage Guide (Vietnamese)
• Multilogin Full Review 2025
• Claim 50% Discount with Coupon Code: ADBNEW50

Final Thoughts

Lalicat Browser may be attractive for light use or experimentation, but if you want to run serious ad operations at scale in 2025, it simply isn’t enough. For me, Multilogin solved all the pain points I faced and gave me the confidence to scale campaigns safely and efficiently.

If you want to avoid wasted time and lost accounts, I strongly recommend starting with Multilogin from the beginning — it will save you headaches down the road.