Browser Stack Used by Top Affiliate Teams Running Native Ads

Jun 11, 2025

—

Browser Stack Used by Top Affiliate Teams Running Native Ads (2025)

In 2025, running native ads profitably is all about scale — and scale means multi-account management. Whether you’re buying traffic on Taboola, Outbrain, MGID, or Revcontent, managing hundreds of accounts requires more than good creatives and offers. You need a solid browser stack to protect your accounts and keep your cashflow running. After working with several 6–7 figure/month affiliate teams, here’s what I’ve learned about the browser stack top players are using this year.

Why Browser Stack Matters for Native Ads

Here’s why your browser stack is critical when running native at scale:

Native platforms fingerprint your browser aggressively → bad fingerprints = fast bans
Buying on multiple platforms requires account diversity → no shared device signals
Running multiple accounts per platform needs profile isolation
VA teams managing accounts need safe profile sharing → avoid cross-contamination

Without a proper stack, you’ll lose accounts fast — and scaling native profitably becomes impossible.

Typical Browser Mistakes Affiliate Teams Make

Using Chrome profiles → too weak for advanced fingerprinting
Running Ghost Browser → not true antidetect, gets flagged fast on native networks
Using AdsPower free tier → works up to ~50 profiles, not scalable for serious buying
Mixing browsers without profile hygiene → causes cross-fingerprint bans

Top teams know this — and they invest accordingly in their browser stack.

What Top Affiliate Teams Are Using (Real Examples)

Here’s a common browser stack I see among 6–7 figure/month native affiliate teams:

Primary browser for buying accounts: Multilogin
Supporting browser for manual QA / domain checks: Chrome / Firefox vanilla + residential IP
Internal tools: Playwright-based automations running in Multilogin headless mode (where supported)
Profile management: Multilogin enterprise sync across media buyers + VA team

Why Top Teams Choose Multilogin

After helping set up browser stacks for multiple top teams, here’s why Multilogin dominates:

Best fingerprint quality — critical for networks like Taboola, Outbrain, MGID
Enterprise profile sync — works perfectly across global teams
Stable for 500–1000 profiles → essential for large operations
Playwright / Puppeteer compatibility — supports automation-based scaling
Low ban rates on native platforms — proven by multiple teams

In short: teams that invest in Multilogin scale faster, burn fewer accounts, and ultimately stay more profitable month after month.

How One Team Uses Multilogin at Scale

One 7-figure/month native team I work with runs:

800+ buying accounts across 4 native networks
Multilogin browser profiles with unique fingerprints per account
Sticky residential proxies (high trust, ISP-allocated)
Automated warm-up flows built with Playwright → gradually scale new accounts
VA team in Philippines uses Multilogin sync to manage creatives & minor campaign changes

Result: They maintain a ~85% account survival rate over 90 days — vs 30–50% when using weaker browser stacks previously.

Resources That Helped Me

Final Thoughts

If you’re running native ads seriously in 2025, your browser stack is as important as your offers or creatives. Multilogin is the antidetect browser that top affiliate teams trust — for good reason.

I’ve helped multiple teams optimize their browser stacks, and every one that switched to Multilogin saw better account survival, faster scaling, and higher profits. If you want to build a future-proof native buying operation, start with the right browser foundation — start with Multilogin.

EN | VN