Browser Choice for Automating Facebook Warm-Up Profiles in 2025

In 2025, warming up Facebook profiles is more critical — and more difficult — than ever. Meta’s AI-based detection systems now analyze everything from your browser fingerprint to your activity timeline and device emulation. If you’re automating Facebook warm-up at scale (for agency clients, ecom, affiliate, or leadgen), your choice of antidetect browser will make or break your operation. After building and testing several warm-up pipelines, here’s my recommendation for the best browser choice this year.

Why Browser Choice Matters for Warm-Up Automation

When warming up Facebook profiles (personal or BM owners), you typically automate:

• Basic browsing to build activity footprint
• Page follows, group joins
• Post likes, comments
• Messenger interactions
• Watching Reels / Videos

If your browser fingerprints are weak or obviously fake:

• Profiles will trigger ID checks or “Confirm Your Identity”
• Cookie consistency will fail → “suspicious login detected”
• Your automation actions will cause bans instead of warming up

This is why using Chrome profiles or basic solutions (SessionBox, Ghost Browser, AdsPower free tiers) is dangerous at scale.

Browsers I Tested in Real Warm-Up Pipelines

• SessionBox: Too risky — warm-up scripts triggered bans
• Ghost Browser: Incomplete fingerprint spoofing — FB detects fast
• AdsPower: Works for small batches (<50 profiles), unstable at scale
• Hidemyacc: Inconsistent cookie handling → broken automation
• Linken Sphere: Too complex, poor compatibility with Puppeteer/Playwright

Result: For automated warm-up pipelines running 200–1000 profiles, none of these solutions were stable enough long-term.

The Browser That Worked Best — Multilogin

After testing Multilogin, I rebuilt our entire warm-up pipeline around it — with far better results.

Why Multilogin is ideal for automated Facebook warm-up:

• Realistic fingerprints — pass Meta’s fingerprint checks even during warm-up
• Consistent cookie handling — no cross-profile contamination
• Compatible with advanced automation stacks (Playwright + Puppeteer)
• Profiles stay stable even with 30–90 day warm-up periods
• Works with high-quality residential proxies seamlessly

Example Automation Pipeline I Use

Here’s an example of my current Multilogin-based warm-up pipeline (which you can adapt):

• Multilogin profile per Facebook account
• Residential proxy (Rotating Sticky → 12h per profile)
• Automation stack: Playwright + browser automation scheduler (self-built)
• Warm-up steps automated:
  • Browsing top news sites + Facebook Feed scrolling
  • Page follows, video views
  • Random friend requests and message replies
  • Simulated human-like activity with variable delays
• Duration: 21–30 days per profile before real ad activity

Result: With Multilogin, my profile survival rate improved from ~40–50% (with other browsers) to 85–90% — a massive ROI boost.

Resources That Helped Me

• Multilogin Free Usage Guide (Vietnamese)
• Multilogin Full Review 2025
• Claim 50% Discount with Coupon Code: ADBNEW50

Final Thoughts

In 2025, automating Facebook warm-up is no longer about clever scripts alone — your antidetect browser is now the foundation. After testing everything on the market, Multilogin is the only browser I trust to keep profiles alive through long warm-up periods.

If you’re serious about scaling Facebook warm-up pipelines, Multilogin is the browser to build your system on. I highly recommend testing it — your profile survival rate (and profitability) will thank you.